Health Care Disparities in Outpatient Diabetes Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Where Do We Stand Now?

OBJECTIVE: We examined diabetes outpatient management during the first 2 years of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in an endocrinology practice with a focus on health care disparities in outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining adults with diabetes during 3 time periods: T1 (March 2019-February 2020), T2 (March 2020-February 2021), and T3 (March 2021-February 2022). Clinical outcomes included body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), Hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and urine albumin:creatinine ratio. Appointment types (virtual vs in-person) were also collected. RESULTS: Frequencies of HgbA1c, BMI, and SBP measurements reduced by 36.0%, 46.3%, and 48.5% in T2, respectively, and remaining 8.7% (HgbA1c), 13.4% (BMI), and 15.2% (SBP) lower at the end of the study period (P < .001) compared to prepandemic levels. However, the average HgbA1c and LDL slightly improved. Clinic appointments per patient increased during the pandemic, fueled by telehealth utilization. Women had fewer in-person visits during T2, those older than 65 had better HgbA1c, and the most socioeconomically deprived group had the worst HgbA1c during every time period. In addition, black patients had worse HgbA1c, LDL, and SBP values throughout the study, which did not worsen over the pandemic. CONCLUSION: While the frequency of health measurements had not fully recovered 2 years into the pandemic, this did not translate to worse diabetes management or a widening of pre-existing disparities. Our study emphasizes the role of equitable health care in minimizing inequalities in diabetes, particularly during times of crisis.

Imaging Cascade - the Importance of Pre-Procedural 3-D Planning in Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background With the COVID-19 pandemic and referral from out-reach centers, there has been a change in practice of assessing left atrial appendage (LAA) via TEE on the day of LAA closure (LAAC). We present a challenging case of inadequate LAAC with WATCHMAN FLX due to suboptimal TEE images. Follow up TEE and CT revealed a much larger LAA ostium that was mostly uncovered. Case An 84 yo male with AF and recent hepatic hematoma, was referred for LAAC. LAA dimensions were measured using a technically difficult intraprocedural (IP) 2D TEE and a 24mm Watchman FLX was successfully implanted. Follow up 3D TEE at 45 days revealed incomplete LAAC with a large PDL. Retrospective review of fluoroscopic images revealed unrecognized filling of a posterior LAA lobe. Decision-making Anticoagulation (AC) was continued for 3 more months, and Cardiac CT was performed which showed persistent under-coverage of the LAA with large PDL of 16.5 x 11.3 mm (159mm2). A much larger ostium was measured on 45 days TEE (27 mm max 2 D dimension) and 145 days CT (18 X 25 mm) vs. 12.9 mm on IP-TEE. AC was continued with consideration of a 2nd adjacent device placement in future. Conclusion TEE on the day of LAAC although implemented in several centers, has its limitations. In the presence of sub-optimal image quality, it can lead to incorrect device sizing and incomplete LAAC as in our case. Cardiac CT with 3D evaluation or 3D TEE are crucial for pre-planning to achieve successful device implantation. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation